The highlight was Lucinda Childs’ Canto Ostinato at the Joyce Theater, danced by the Gibney Company, which recently landed Childs as a resident choreographer for five years. Childs has worked continuously since the 1960s in opera, theater, and dance. Early on, she created conceptual pieces with the Judson Movement, and ran a company, which was disbanded in 2019. So the recent occasional Childs dance in repertory, or unique remountings, have been most welcome.
Canto Ostinato is a prĂ©cis of Childs’ mesmerizing style, based on crisp body geometries and repeating diagonal phrases danced by four to music by Simeon Ten Holt. Her dances have a pared-down look, from the neat costumes by Dominique Drillot (who also designed the set and film—vertical light bars that crossed the upstage scrim), to the ethereal lighting by Tsubasa Kamei, and the result feels like the perfect amount of each element combined. I could watch this on repeat for a very long time.
The context for the dance felt a bit jarring, comprising works by Medhi Walerski (with a Euro-neoclassical feel), Jawole Willa Jo Zollar (passionate and turbulent), and Mthuthuzeli November (exuberant). The sum total certainly showed Gibney Company’s stylistic flexibility and range, so key to a repertory company. But I look forward to seeing much more of Childs’ concert dance done by the multi-talented Gibney dancers. Kudos to Gina Gibney for this invaluable recognition of one of the undersung choreographers of our time.
![]() |
| Chronicle. Photo: M. Sherwood |
At City Center, Martha Graham Dance Company’s performances were pieces in a larger mosaic of the troupe’s 100th year celebration. As with many single choreographer companies whose founders have passed, this has evolved by necessity into what is essentially a repertory company based on Graham’s rep. Her contributions to the program were Diversion of Joy and Chronicle, two of her more broadly popular dances, at least for today’s audiences. Even after seeing these works many times over the years, Graham’s maximally expressive, muscular, yet elegant vocabulary still feels absolutely fresh. It represents what the human body and spirit can achieve with determination and training. The dancers’ bodies are so strong and have undergone such extreme training that they seem like weapons themselves. And yet the sculptural shapes formed by the recombining of head, arms, torso, and legs still feel at once fresh and fundamental. Both Graham’s and Childs’ oeuvre have been marked by a certain refinement and classicism which helps to elucidate their crisp styles. How providential that we will continue to see their work regularly for the foreseeable future.
![]() |
| Diversion of Angels. Photo: M. Sherwood |
Another veteran of contemporary dance, Doug Varone, popped up with his troupe at the venerable Hudson Hall, in Hudson. Fresh off of pulling out of a scheduled Kennedy Center run, Varone received a warm embrace from the audience. The smart program, hosted by Varone and performed without fancy lights or costumes, led off with a run-through of Lux, one of his best-known ensemble works. He then recruited audience members to help in choreographing something new—he scattered the eight across the stage, and directed his dancers, one-by-one, to move toward and interact in different ways with the volunteers. This group then left the stage, and the dancers performed the framework without them. In yet another section, a pair performed a duet to a Handel aria, and then the same movement (with a coda) to Janis Joplin; the result felt markedly different and showed how music affects context. In the first half, viewers were given glimpses into the various choices that go into choreographing, and no doubt ways to better comprehend the experience of watching contemporary dance—which can often be opaque.
![]() |
| Doug Varone at work. Photo: David McIntyre |



